Common sense and good sense in Deleuze
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15174/rv.v0i23.398Abstract
The concept of common sense is of vital importance in Deleuze’s philosophy, but lacks nonetheless a detailed study. This paper aims to fill that gap, by offering a rigorous analysis of its different meanings and nuances. We will hold that there are three meanings of “common sense” in Deleuze: as the Image of thought, as concordia facultatum and as the correlate of good sense. In the first two cases, common sense conflicts with Deleuzean transcendental empiricism, insofar as it assumes a pre-given thought and imposes a condition of concordance between the faculties; in the latter, it provides the form of an object in general, which will be qualified by good sense. Good sense, in turn, imposes an eschatological temporal determination and a sedentary spatial and ontological determination to sense.References
DeLanda, Manuel, 1998, “Deleuze and the Open-Ended Becoming of the World”, en Chaos/Control: Complexity Conference, Universität Bielefeld. Disponible online: http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/delanda/pages/becoming.htm.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1985, Cinéma 2. L’Image-Temps, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles, 2010, Derrames. Entre el capitalismo y la esquizofrenia, trad. Equipo Editorial Cactus, Cactus, Buenos Aires.
Deleuze, Gilles, 2003, Deux régimes de fous. Textes et entretiens (1975-1995), editado por David Lapoujade, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1994, Difference and Repetition, trad. Paul Patton, Athlone Press, Londres.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1968, Différence et répétition, PUF, París.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1963, La Philosophie critique de Kant, PUF, París.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1969, Logique du sens, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles, 1990, Pourparlers. 1972-1990, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles y Guattari, Félix, 1980, Capitalisme et schizophrénie II. Mille plateaux, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles y Guattari, Félix, 1991, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?, Minuit, París.
Deleuze, Gilles y Parnet, Claire, 1996 [1977], Dialogues, Flammarion, París.
Descartes, René, 1997, Meditaciones metafísicas y otros textos, trad. E. López y M. Graña, Gredos, Madrid.
Dotti, Jorge Eugenio, 1986, “La distinción kantiana entre juicios de percepción y de experiencia”, en Revista de Filosofía y Teoría Política, nº 26-27, La Plata, pp. 239-242.
Flaxman, Gregory, 2015, “A More Radical Empiricism”, en Deleuze and Pragmatism, compilado por Sean Bowden, Simone Bignall y Paul Patton, Routledge, Nueva York y Londres, pp. 55-72.
Hegel, G.W.F., 1989, Diferencia entre el sistema de filosofía de Fichte y el de Schelling, trad. Juan Antonio Rodríguez Tous, Alianza, Madrid.
Hegel, G.W.F., 1968, Gesammelte Werke. Band IV. Jenaer Kritische Schriften, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburgo.
Hegel, G.W.F., 2012, La diferencia entre los sistemas filosóficos de Fichte y de Schelling, trad. David Zapero Maier, Buenos Aires, Prometeo, Buenos Aires.
Heidegger, Martin, 2002, Was heisst denken (Gesamtausgabe. I. Abteilung: Veröffentlichte Schriften 1910-1976 — Band 8), Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
Hölderlin, Friedrich, 1962, „Urteil und Sein“, en Sämtliche Werke. 6 Bände, Band 4, F. Beissner, Stuttgart, pp. 226-228.
Kant, Immanuel, 2009, Crítica de la razón pura, 2da ed., trad. Mario Caimi, Colihue, Buenos Aires.
Kant, Immanuel, 1900 ss., Kants gesammelte Schriften. Abteilung 1: Werke: Band III: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (2. Aufl. 1787), Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlín.
Kerslake, Christian, 2009, Immanence and the Vertigo of Philosophy. From Kant to Deleuze, Edinburgh University Press, Edimburgo.
Madelrieux, Stéphane, 2015, “Pluralism without Pragmatism: Deleuze and the Ambiguities of the French Reception of James”, en Deleuze and Pragmatism, compilado por Sean Bowden, Simone Bignall y Paul Patton, Routledge, Nueva York y Londres, pp. 89-104.
Marx, Karl, 1987, Miseria de la filosofía. Respuesta a la Filosofía de la miseria de P.-J. Proudhon, trad. Martí Soler, Siglo XXI, México DF.
Núñez García, Amanda, 2010, “La fisura del sistema: de Schelling y Hölderlin a Deleuze”, en Actas del congreso “El fondo de la historia: idealismo, romanticismo y sus repercusiones”, Madrid, pp. 114-121.
Núñez García, Amanda, 2012, “La grieta del sistema: Hölderlin entre Schelling y Deleuze”, en Lógos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, vol. 45, Madrid, pp. 145-161.
Rölli, Marc, 2003, Gilles Deleuze. Philosophie des Transzendentalen Empirismus, Turia + Kant, Viena.
Sauvagnargues, Anne, 2009, Deleuze. L’empirisme transcendantal, PUF, París.
Wahl, Jean, 1953, Traité de métaphysique: Cours professés en Sorbonne, Payot, París.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Author(s) who publish in this journal do accept the next conditions:
According to copyright regulations, Valenciana does recognize and respect the authors’ moral right, as well as the right of property, which will be assigned to the journal for its diffusion in open access.
Valenciana does not charge authors for the submission, editorial process or publication in the journal.
All texts published and distributed by Valenciana (without exception) are supported by the license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as they mention the author and the first publication.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive use of his article published in Valenciana (e.g. including it in an institutional repository or in printed/electronic media), as long as it is explicitly clarified that the article was published for the first time in this journal.
For these purposes, authors must sign and send the letter of submission and copyright transfer form in a PDF file to this email address: revistavalenciana@gmail.com
This journal is under a license by Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)).
