Surveillance in the work of Philip K. Dick: Identities, desires and social conflicts

Authors

  • Nelson Arteaga Botello FLACSO, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15174/rv.v0i21.322

Abstract

he article examines how surveillance, in Philip K. Dick’s work, allows actors and institutions: a) to construct identities, b) to manage desires, and c) to establish areas of disputes and conflicts of power. Surveillance sometimes appears as a mechanism that serves as domination and social control, and at other times as a device of resistance that creates spaces of resistance and social autonomy. Therefore, surveillance can be used for civil and anti-civil purposes. The faces of vigilance in Dick’s work allow us to understand how it develops in democratic and differentiated societies, unlike the metaphor of the Orwellian “Big Brother” developed in a context where an ideology and a totalitarian political regime prevail.

Author Biography

Nelson Arteaga Botello, FLACSO, Mexico

Profesor Investigador

References

Albrechtslund, Anders y Dubbeld, Lynsey (2005), “The Plays and Arts of Surveillance: Studying, Surveillance as Entertainment”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 3(2/3): 216-221

Alexander, Jeffrey, 2006, The Civil Sphere, University Press, Oxford, pp. 793.

Andrejevic, Mark, 2005, iSpy. Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. 325.

Bauman, Zygmunt y Lyon David, 2013, Liquid Surveillance, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 193.

Best Stevens y Kellner, Douglas, 2003, “The Apocalyptic Vision of Philip K. Dick”, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, Illinios, Vol. 3(2): 186-202

Bogard, William, 2006, “Welcome to the society of control”, en Surveillance and visibility, Toronto University Press, pp. 4-25,

Booker, Keith, 1994, Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide, Greenwood Press, Westport, pp. 408.

Bould, Mark, 2015, “The futures market: American Utopias”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 83-98.

Bradbury, Ray, 2005, Fahrenheit 451, Minotauro, México, pp. 251.

Brooks, Peter, 2005, Realist Vision, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp.242

Cohen, Stanley, 1985, Visions of Social Control, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 336.

Deibert, Roland, 2003, “Black Code: Censorship, Surveillance, and the Militarisation of Cyberspace”, Journal of International Studies, Szczecin, Vol.32 (3): 501-530.

Dick, Philip K. [1981], 2013, La invasión divina, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 254.

Dick, Philip K. [1977], 2006, Una mirada a la oscuridad, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 271.

Dick, Philip K. [1974], 2011, Fluyan mis lágrimas, dijo el policía, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp.265.

Dick, Philip K. [1970], 2007, Nuestros amigos de Frolik 8, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 238.

Dick, Philip K. [1969], 2013, Ubik, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 222.

Dick, Philip K. [1964], 2007, Simulacra, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 221.

Dick, Philip K. [1955], 2007, Lotería solar, Minotauro, Barcelona, pp. 213.

Dick, Philip K., 2005, The Collected Stories of Philip K. Dick, Citadel Press, New York, pp. 434.

Freedman, Carl, 2000, Critical Theory and Science Fiction, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, pp.228.

Gates, Kelly, 2009, New Media Addiction, Television & New Media, Tulane, Vol. 10 (1): 58-60

Gilliom Johm y Monahan, Torin, 2012, Supervision: An introduction to the surveillance society, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 200.

Habermas, Jürgen, 1989, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 326.

Haggerty Kevin y Ericcson, Richard (2000), The surveillant assemblage, British Journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605-622

Hayles, Kahterin, 1997, “RFID: Human Agency and Meaning in Information-Intensive Environments”, Theory, Culture & Society, London, Vol. 26(2–3): 47–72.

Higgins, David, 2015, “American Science Fiction after 9/11”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 44-57.

Huxley, Aldous, 2010, A brave new world, Harper Perennial, New York, pp. 268.

Jameson, Fredric, 2007, Archaeologies of the future. The desire called Utopia and other Science Fictions, Verso, New York, pp. 431.

Jameson, Fredric, 1989, Documentos de cultura. Documentos de barbarie. La narrativa como acto socialmente simbólico, Visor, Madrid, pp. 243.

Jameson, Fredric, 1988, The Ideologies of Theory. Essays 1971-1986. Volume 2: The Syntax of History, Routledge, London, pp. 208.

Kammerer, Dietmar, 2012, “Surveillance in Literature, Film and Television”, en Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, Routledge, New York, pp. 99-106.

Koskela, Hille, 2006, “The other side of surveillance: Webcams, power and agency”, en Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, pp. 163-181.

Lee, Gwen y Sauter, Doris, 2000, What if our world is their heaven? The final conversations of Philip K. Dick, Overlook, New York, pp. 204.

Lem, Stanislaw 1975, “Science Fiction: A hopeless case-with exceptions”, en Philip K. Dick: Electric shepherd, Norstrilia Press, Melburne, pp 69-94.

Levin, Ira, 2010, This Perfect Day, New York, Pegasus Books, pp. 320.

Link, Carl, 2010, Understanding Philip K. Dick, University of South Carolina, South Carolina, pp. 179.

Link, Carl y Canavan, Gerry, 2015, The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 254.

Lyon, David, 1994, The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 270.

Mackey, Douglas, 1988, Philip K Dick, T Wayne, Boston, pp. 157.

Mäkinen, Liisa, 2016, “Surveillance On/Off: Examining Home Surveillance Systems From The User’s Perspective”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 14(1): 59-77.

Martin, Aaron, Brakel, Rosamunde y Bernhard, Daniel, 2009, “Understanding resistance to digital surveillance Towards a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston 6(3): 213-232.

Marks, Peter, 2005, “Imagining Surveillance: Utopian Visions and Surveillance Studies”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 3(2/3), 222-239,

Marx, Gary, 2009, “Soul Train: The New Surveillance in Popular Music”, en Lessons from the Identity Trial: Anonymity, Privacy and identity in a Networked Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 377-399.

Muri, Allison, 2003, “Of Shit and the Soul: Tropes of Cybernetic Disembodiment in Contemporary Culture”, Body & Society, London, Vol. 9(3): 73–92

Nellis, Mike, 2009, “Since ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’: Representation of Surveillance in Literary Fiction”, en New Directions in Surveillance and Privacy, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, pp. 178-204.

Nolan, William F. y Clayton, Johnson, 1969, Logan’s Run, Dell Books, New York, pp. 158.

Nussbaum, Martha, 1990, Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 423.

Palmer, Christopher, 2005, “Philip K. Dick”, en A companion to Science Fiction, Blackwell, Malden, pp. 389-397.

Philmus, Robert, 1991, “The two faces of Philip K. Dick”, Science Fiction Studies, Greencastle, Vol. 18: 93-103.

Pia Lara, Maria, 1998, “Narrative Cultural Interweavings: Between Fact and Fiction”, en Moral Textures: Feminist Narratives in the Public Sphere, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 92-104.

Leslie Poles Hartley, 1987, Facial Justice, Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford, pp. 225.

Rand, Ayn, 1999, Anthem, Plume, New York, pp. 253.

Reed, Isaac, 2011, Interpretation and Social Knowledge. On the use of Theory in the Human Sciences, The University of Chicago Press Chicago, pp. 216.

Rorty, Richard, 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 228.

Seed, David, 2011, Science Fiction, A very Short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 147.

Shapiro, Michael, 2009, “Managing Urban Security: City Walls and Urban Metis”, Security Dialogue, Ottawa,Vol. 40(4–5): 443–461.

Sheldon, Rebekah, 2015, “After America”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 206-218.

Srinivas, Nidhi, 1999, Managers as androids: Reading moral agency in Philip K. Dick, Organization, Vol. 6(4): 609-624.

Sutin, Lawrence, 1989, Divine Invasions: A life of Philip K. Dick, Carroll & Graf, New York, pp. 368.

Vaz, Paulo y Bruno, Fernanda, 2003, “Types of Self-Surveillance: from abnormality to individuals ‘at risk’ ”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 1(3): 272-291.

Wald, Priscilla, 2015, “Science, technology, and the environment”, en The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 179-193.

Whitebrook, Maureen, 1996, “Taking the narrative turn: what the novel has to offer political theory”, en Literature and the Political Imagination. Routledge, London, pp. 32-52.

Williams Raymond, 2001, Cultura y sociedad, Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires, pp. 288.

Williams, Paul, 1986, Only apparently real, Arbor House, New York, pp. 184.

Yar, Majid, 2003, “Panoptic Power and the Pathologisation of Vision: Critical Reflections on the Foucauldian Thesis”, Surveillance & Society, Kingston, 1(3): 254-271.

Zamyantin, Yevgeny, 1993, We, Penguin Books, London, pp. 242.

Zedner, Lucia, 2007, “Pre-crime and post-criminology?”, Theoretical Criminology, Oxford Vol. 11(2): 261–281; 1362–4806.

Published

2018-01-02

How to Cite

Arteaga Botello, N. (2018). Surveillance in the work of Philip K. Dick: Identities, desires and social conflicts. Valenciana, (21), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.15174/rv.v0i21.322